Most facilities we walk into have an arc flash study somewhere in the building. It has been a requirement long enough that finding a facility which never had one done is unusual, and there is nearly always a safety manager relying on it.

So the question worth asking is what year it was done, and what has changed in the facility since.

Things that change after a study is filed

  • Equipment gets added or replaced.
  • Circuits get reconfigured, or a feed gets rerouted during a shutdown.
  • Production changes and the loads move with it.
  • The utility changes something upstream, which moves your available fault current.
  • Nobody is certain what year the study was completed.
  • The labels on the equipment haven't been touched since.
  • Between reviews, nobody owns keeping any of it current.

Why the drift matters

A study is accurate for the system it measured, on the day it measured it. Every change on that list moves the calculated incident energy at a panel, and not one of them updates the label on the door or the page in the binder.

Your safety manager reads the label, puts on the PPE it calls for, and does the work. Everything about that is correct. The protection is just sized for the hazard your facility used to have.

It rarely goes wrong dramatically. The original study assumed a set of conditions, the facility changed, and those assumptions quietly stopped holding. Nobody noticed, because nothing about a finished study invites a second look at it.

Keeping it current

Two things, and the second gets skipped more often than the first.

NFPA 70E calls for the incident energy analysis to be reviewed at least every five years, and again whenever a major modification or renovation happens. That second clause is the one facilities miss. A reconfiguration in March does not wait politely for the five-year review to come due.

The people opening those doors also have to be trained to the numbers posted today. Most facilities buy the study and stop there, which is understandable, because the study is a thing you can hold and training feels like the part you can defer. A label only does its job for somebody who has been taught what it means.

Where to start

If you can't say what year your study was done, start there. It usually takes an afternoon to find out. From there the question is what a complete program covers, so you can see which parts of yours are current and which have drifted.

Not sure how current yours is? Tell us roughly when it was done and what's changed since. An engineer will look at it and tell you whether it needs revisiting.
Request an Engineering Review →