ALPHA ENGINEERINGPower & Energy · Since 1979
We run the incident energy analysis, label every panel to match it, revise the work procedures around the results, and train the people who open those doors. Then we keep it current as your system changes, because a study only protects anyone for as long as it still describes your facility.
What you end up with: a program your safety manager can stand behind, not a binder on a shelf.This isn't a decision about whether to have a study. It's a decision about how the program around that study gets maintained over time.
A vendor does the study, delivers the report and labels, and the engagement ends. Lower upfront cost, but nobody owns the updates that come later.
Fits well if: your layout rarely changes and EHS already owns safety documentation tightly.Your EHS team owns the program after the study, tracking changes and scheduling retraining. Works when they have the time and technical depth.
Fits well if: you have dedicated EHS staff with the depth to track this themselves.An engineer stays attached to the system, reviewing changes as they happen and keeping the study, labels, and procedures current together.
Fits well if: your system changes regularly, or you'd rather not decide when a re-study is warranted.Safety is the goal. Whichever approach fits your facility, a program that actually protects people has to keep four things true at the same time, not just on the day the study was delivered.
Let's take a look at where your arc flash program actually stands. We won't put a proposal in front of you until we have.
Let's Talk →